Artificial Intelligence in Monaco

Artificial Intelligence in Monaco

Controversies

The Case Against Fully Autonomous AI Agents - #24

Series: “Controversies”

Leonardo Fabbri's avatar
Leonardo Fabbri
Mar 06, 2025
∙ Paid
Paper page - Fully Autonomous AI Agents Should Not be Developed

Introduction

Welcome back to Controversies, the series where we dive headlong into the most incendiary debates at the heart of AI. This week, we’re zooming in on a new flashpoint in the AI world: the push toward fully autonomous AI agents. Picture a realm where these agents manage everything from our business workflows to our military defense, all while human oversight fades into the background. Their boosters see a self-governing AI era as the pinnacle of progress; skeptics warn it’s a perilous path to relinquishing essential human control.

In this post, we’ll take a close look at:

  • Autonomy Risks: How giving AI systems free rein could open a Pandora’s box of safety and security threats.

  • Alignment Challenges: Why even the most advanced AI models can veer off-course—often in unpredictable, high-stakes ways.

  • Ethical Quagmires: The moral hazards of entrusting machines with decisions that blur lines of accountability and human values.

  • Policy Roadblocks: The looming question of whether current legal frameworks can—or should—contain these burgeoning capabilities.

Strap in—it’s going to be a fascinating deep dive into one of the most hotly contested battlegrounds in AI. If you’re intrigued by the fine line between human command and machine autonomy, subscribe now to join a community that doesn’t just watch the AI revolution happen, but actively tries to shape its trajectory.

This post is for paid subscribers

Already a paid subscriber? Sign in
© 2025 Artificial Intelligence Monaco · Publisher Privacy ∙ Publisher Terms
Substack · Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start your SubstackGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture